Saturday, March 1, 2014

First Essay Rough Draft: It Rains On My City


Samuel Jimenez
Professor Monique Williams
English 1A
February 28th, 2014
It Rains On My City
A dark cloud covers a city filled with drugs, violence and a failing school district. Despite the efforts of gentrification, the misery produced by the dark cloud is still evident, especially in the schools. But less than one mile and an overpass away, the sun shines brightly on one of the most affluent neighborhoods in the nation. A neighborhood filled with wealth, where students thrive and one of the nations great academic institutions calls home. The grass is greener on the “west side” and all you have to do to see the difference between East Palo Alto and Palo Alto is cross over that overpass.
Ask yourself, who creates these imaginary boundaries in our society? How could it be that all that separates one of the wealthiest zip codes in the nation from a neighborhood with two of the lowest performing schools in California is just an overpass? Is it the failing neighborhood that produces the failing school?
My research of the topic, aided by the reading of Jonathan Kozol’s “Savage Inequalities”, part of Paulo Freire’s “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, Erich Fromm’s “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem” along with watching Davis Guggenheim’s “Waiting for ‘Superman’” documentary about the American public education system, led me to the belief that instead of failing neighborhoods producing failing schools, in fact, failing neighborhoods, like East Palo Alto, were produced by failing schools. In a society that’s growing rapidly, I believe that it is all of our obligations, as a society, to help reform the system that leads these failing schools.
Within these failing schools are children who, despite their, at times, troubled upbringing and familiarity with negative influences from their primary socialization, show promise and enthusiasm during their early years in education. Young children, because of their innocence, have yet to realize the inequalities in our education system at this point in their lives. Although the problems of our education system exist in these early years, it isn’t until later that the effects of these issues are immediately noticeable through the child’s grades. Father Michael Doyle, pastor of Sacred Heart Church in North Camden, illustrates this innocence in Savage Inequalites, “’It rains on my city,’ said an eight year old I know, ‘but I see rainbows in the puddles.’” The loss off innocence begins later on. In Guggenheim’s documentary “Waiting for ‘Superman’”, educator Geoffrey Canada says “Between the 5th and 7th grade, you see a huge number of minority students go from being ‘B’ students to ‘D’ students.” Kozol’s book “Savage Inequalities” backs up this though by saying, “By fifth or sixth grade, many children demonstrate their loss of faith by staying out of school.” These children didn’t just all of a sudden become stupid, they became conscious. They became conscious of the inequality that the face in our system. German sociologist Erik Erikson illustrates this sudden consciousness in his epigenic principle. The epigenic principle is a formulation, which states that humans develop through eight different stages. Through their age, most 5th through 7th graders fall into the epigenic principle stages of competence and fidelity. They begin to ask themselves if they are competent and also begin to question who they are and what surrounds them.
In those stages, children become increasingly aware of what they lack and in the case of a city like East Palo Alto, in comparison to Palo Alto, or as illustrated in Savage Inequalities, a town like East St. Louis in comparison to the near-by Fairview Heights, they also become aware of what others have. The difference in environment can take a toll on these children as they begin to establish their own identity. Los Angeles-based rapper, Nipsey Hussle, speaks on this in his song “Crenshaw and Slauson” as he raps, “The demonstrations speak loud, so I ain’t sayin’ much. Was a charismatic nigga, now I don’t play as much, because life is real when you live it in a place like us. School pictures crackin’ smiles, now my face is stuck, shell-shocked to see how much they really hated us.” The loss of charisma or their own smile is realistic for children from failing schools. What’s left to smile or be charismatic about when you’re going to a school that the system neglects? Why should they continue to be neglected when “the block” can show them love? That’s what comes to mind for these children.
In order to combat the calls of the street life, the child must look differently at the scenario. Instead of feeling like there is no way out of this cycle the system has created, they must begin to find something within the school to cling to. If the system won’t change, we must help change the perception of the scenario for these children. Paulo Freire says in the “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”, “To do this authentically, they must perceive their state, not as fated and unalterable, but merely as limiting and therefore challenging.” A challenge. We must help them to look at this failing neighborhood and this failing school as a challenge waiting to be overcome. As a society, we must build these children’s identities to be that of challenge seekers and challenge defeaters.
To break through the wall, the challenge, puts in front of us, we should be looking to not only highlight the avenues currently available for our children to succeed, but also create new avenues for them to succeed. We shouldn’t limit the options our children have as students. We should be challenging them to find new ways to succeed and to pursue what they find joy in or have a passion for. The problem begins with the fact that, “Sports and music… are for many children… ‘The only avenues of success,’” as the chairman of the Illinois Board of Education observes in Savage Inequalities. As a firm believer in both sports and music as tools to help build confidence in young children, I believe that they’re both very much-needed in urban communities. Should they be the “only avenues” available though? No, they shouldn’t. Compton rapper, Kendrick Lamar, notes in his song “Black Boy Fly”, “My mama didn’t raise me up to be jealous-hearted, like most of the winners call it. ‘Regardless of where you stay, hold your head and continue marching,’ that’s what she said but in my head, I wanted to be like Jordan [or] award touring the country with money from mic recording. The only way out the ghetto, you know the stereotype, shooting hoops or live on the stereo.” As positive an effect music and athletics have on some children, they must also be aware that there is more available to them. They can’t be aware of that possibility if the possibility does not yet exist for many of them.
Savage Inequalities speaks about the lack of resources many times. When comparing New Trier to the schools in South Side Chicago, Kozol notes that New Trier students have up-to-date technology, three separate gyms and studios for dance instruction. Much like many of the students in Hayward, Oakland and East Palo Alto, students in South Side Chicago don’t have those resources available to them. Kozol also comments on how “…children in one set of schools are educated to be governors; children in the other set of schools are trained for being governed.” But as Father Michael Doyle, illustrates in Savage Inequalities, “When you’re on your knees, you take whatever happens to come by…” With the lack of opportunities to pursue something different, what choice does a child in a failing school have other than “shooting hoops” or playing music? It’s either “the block” or the gym, and as for the 8-year old child Father Doyle talks about seeing rainbows in the puddles of rain falling on his city, we must ask ourselves “How long will this child look for rainbows?” If we don’t offer our children more outlets and avenues to pursue a successful life, they will be another dropout statistic dropped into the failing neighborhood. Our children will become blind to the rainbows they once saw and will only see the dark cloud left above them.
New avenues and outlets are not free, though. To connect more personally with the book, I sat down with Lorin Eden Elementary School (a school at which I coach basketball) principal Kim Watts, to talk about the problems facing Hayward schools and possible solutions. The first solution she offered fell in line with Camden High principal, Ruthie Green-Brown’s first priority as she told Kozol, “My first priority, if we had equal funding, would be the salaries of the teachers.” Watts talked about compensation for teachers being the biggest issue facing Hayward public schools. Watts explained to me that the best teachers are able to think innovatively and differently, but as illustrated in Savage Inequalities, the difficulty is not always in getting good teachers but in retaining them once they become a known commodity. How can a failing school attract and retain proficient teachers without having the ability to compensate them the same way schools in more affluent neighborhoods have?
It then becomes an issue not of who is more deserving, or in need, of that teacher, but who is able to pay them more. It isn’t always the case, but the thought that everyone has a price isn’t completely untrue, and as a good teacher continues to grow, it is likely that they’ll be offered more comfort financially in a different school. Without an increase in funding, it becomes nearly impossible to retain these teachers. Kozol points out that “Investment strategies in education, as we’ve seen, are often framed in the terms: ‘how much is it worth investing in this child as opposed to that one? Where will we see the best return?’” With the thought that a child from a more successful neighborhood can provide the education system, and society as a whole, with a better return on investment, we leave children from failing neighborhoods with a failing approach to their education. In an interview with Roses in Concrete, educated Jeff Duncan-Andrade says “The radical disconnect between the intensity of those experiences in the lives of urban youth, and the kinds of things we are focusing on attempting to teach them and measure their learning around is so ridiculous. The ways in which we approach schooling in this country, with poor kids, particularly poor kids in urban environments would never be tolerated for middle class or wealthy children.” It’s a system built on inequality. Where the tolerance levels for what is acceptable for wealthy children is extremely different from those of children from failing schools. What’s acceptable for Longwood Elementary would never be acceptable in Castro Valley, but it’s a system that, in a sense, is doing what it was built to do.
Our system of education was built during an era of industrialization, in which it was meant to prepare students to take on different roles in society. The problem is that our schools have remained the same while the world around them has changed. The job market has changed but we are still preparing students for the same roles we were preparing them for many years ago, whether those roles exist or not. But as Paulo Freire says, “Knowledge emerges only through invention and re-invention, through the restless, impatient continuing, hopeful inquiry human beings pursue in the world, with the world and with each other.” Our education is going through what sociologists call “cultural lag”, or, the tendency for elements of material culture to change more rapidly than elements of nonmaterial culture. While our world becomes increasingly dependent on the fast-changing technology industry, our education system falls behind. Principal Watts suggested looking at major tech companies and seeing what their staff rooms look like and then restructuring some of our classes to reflect those staff rooms. The idea is to restructure our system to fill the current needs of our society.
Restructuring a system that still benefits the wealthy is no easy task. Being a catalyst for change is not always welcome; especially when many feel that the system is working or are comfortable with their current situation. A willingness to be a martyr, of sorts, is necessary for the system to change. In “Waiting for ‘Superman’”, former Washington D.C. Chancellor Michelle Rhee says “There’s this unbelievable willingness to turn a blind eye to the injustices happening to kids every single day in our schools, in the name of harmony amongst adults.” We can either continue to turn a blind eye, or face the problem head on. “To be in favor of redistribution of resources and/or racial integration would require a great deal of courage—and a soaring sense of vision—in a president or any other politician.” It will take an act of disobedience to positively impact the failing schools, and as Erich Fromm says in “Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem,” “In order to disobey, one must have the courage to be alone.” Courage. We must have courage to make a change in the system. We must have courage to give children the best that we, as a society, have available to us. It may take a step out of the comfort zone for many, but it’s a necessary change if we want to see our education system turn around.
The system is failing many children. Whose obligation is it to help these children in failing schools? Principal Watts believes that “it’s the obligation of everyone to restructure the system.” Not just the principals, teachers or the parents. It’s our obligation, as a society, to help other people’s children. If we continue to turn this blind eye, our schools will continue to fail and, in turn, our neighborhoods will continue to fail. Through increased funding, we must change the mindset of our children. We must challenge them to overcome the obstacles set in front of them so that they do not give up as they reach adolescence. We must provide children with more options, more avenues for success. We must give failing schools a better opportunity to retain successful teachers. “It rains on my city,’ said an eight-year old I know, ‘but I see rainbows in the puddles.” So whether it be East Palo Alto, Hayward, East St. Louis, the Bronx or any other troubled neighborhood, we must keep those rainbows alive for these children. We must provide them with the opportunity to step out of that dark cloud, and to reach the pot of gold at the end of those rainbows.


Let ‘em reach up to the clouds.
Can’t eat if we don’t feed ‘em. Can’t read if we don’t teach ‘em.
There’s no light if we just hide ‘em. Don’t just let ‘em die.
Let ‘em shine.
Let ‘em shine on.


Works Cited:
Kozol, Jonathan. Savage Inequalities, Broadway Books, 1991.
Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum Books, 1993.
Fromm, Erich. Disobedience as a Psychological and Moral Problem
Curry, Tim. Jiobu, Robert. Schwirian, Kent. Sociology For the Twenty-First Century, Pearson, 2010.
Guggenheim, Davis. Waiting For ‘Superman’, Walden Media, 2010.
Duncan-Andrade, Jeff. Roses in Concrete, 2012
Hussle, Nipsey. “Crenshaw and Slauson”, Crenshaw, 2013
Lamar, Kendrick. “Black Boy Fly”, Good Kid, M.A.A.D. City, 2012
Legend, John & The Roots. “Shine”, Wake Up!, 2010

No comments:

Post a Comment